| JERUSALEM ONLINE Your Link to Israel  |
Islam, the fake religion of peace wants to Dominate! YouTube video - 1:23 minutes Islam Conquer US-Europe PMW YouTube video - 0:43 seconds Order Aaron Klein's THE LATE GREAT STATE OF ISRAEL Here! See article #5 ,"Dire warning: Israel must strike Iran now," for more information. |
- The Middle East Peace Scam, Canada Free Press, Daniel Greenfield
- On Biden in Israel, National Review Online, Daniel Pipes
- Biden Trip Reveals Ominous Side of Obama's Treatment of Israel, American Thinker, Leo Rennert
- Hey, Joe, What d'ya Know, Arutz-7, Gerald A. Honigman
- Look Out! , The Jerusalem Post , Barry Rubin
- Dire warning: Israel must strike Iran now, WorldNetDaily, John Bolton
Daniel Greenfield
Canada Free Press, March 10, 2010
"I condemn the decision by the government of Israel to advance planning for new housing units in East Jerusalem" -Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, March 09, 2010
For nearly twenty years the great sham of the Middle East Peace Process has dragged on. And this despicable scam has consisted of only one policy, only one platform and only one plan. Pressuring Israel for more concessions.
Year in and year out, new peace conferences were declared and new plans for peace were hammered out. All of them had one thing in common, they carved up Israel for a non-existent peace. When Arafat and his gang of terrorists made a concession, it was to demand 5 percent less of Israel in the current phase of negotiations. When Israel made a concession, it was to turn over another 10 percent of land to its worst enemies in this phase of negotiations… in exchange for them putting off their demands for that 5 percent into the next phase of the negotiations. And this sick charade in which Israel gave and the terrorists took was the peace process.
While this great surrender process was going on, outside the bombs went on exploding, tearing apart buses, restaurants, malls and families-the politicians and diplomats in charge excused the terrorists and damned Israel if it so much as lifted a finger to defend itself, or erected a single checkpoint to catch at least one of the terrorists on the way to kill a dozen people in Jerusalem....
Click here for the complete article, or copy and paste this link into your web browser:
http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/article.php?id=5211
Daniel Pipes
National Review Online, March 10, 2010
Joe Biden's trip to Israel fits neatly into the context of the Obama administration's internal struggle over Israel policy.
The far left prevailed initially, as evidenced by Hillary Clinton's May 2009 declaration that Obama "wants to see a stop to settlements - not some settlements, not outposts, not natural growth exceptions." But this approach bombed, permitting the center left to take over in about September 2009.
The center left still rules the roost, as Biden's twin statements yesterday indicate. First, he offered his administration's "absolute, total, unvarnished commitment to Israel's security." Then he slammed an Israeli decision to build new housing units in Jerusalem as a step that "undermines the trust we need right now."
The center-left approach is better than the far-left approach but neither has a chance of succeeding. What Israel needs is not hectoring about its residential housing policies but an American ally that encourages it to win its war against the irredentist Palestinians of both Fatah and Hamas.
Click here for the complete article, or copy and paste this link into your web browser:
http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/article.php?id=5204
Leo Rennert
American Thinker, March 12, 2010
The most salient part of Vice President Biden's speech in Tel Aviv came toward the end of his address -- after he spoke about the "unbreakable bond" between the U.S. and Israel, after he assured his audience that the administration has an "ironclad commitment to Israel's security," and after he reassured skeptical Israelis that America "stands shoulder to shoulder" with the Jewish state.
Once these nice pieties were out of the way, Biden got to the real, unbalanced U.S. position vis-ŕ-vis Israel and the Palestinians -- again "condemning" Israel for moving ahead with plans for more housing units in East Jerusalem, while showering fulsome praise on Palestinian President Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad.
Having lauded Abbas and Fayyad as "willing partners" for peace and competent leaders to bring about a genuine two-state solution, Biden added in the same paragraph this contrast with the Israeli government:
But instead, two days ago, the Israeli government announced it would advance planning for new housing in East Jerusalem. Because that decision undermined the trust required for productive negotiations, I -- and at the request of President Obama -- condemned it immediately and unequivocally....
Click here for the complete article, or copy and paste this link into your web browser:
http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/article.php?id=5205
Gerald A. Honigman
Arutz-7, March 12, 2010
A short guide to the Middle East--and the hypocritical world-- in an open letter to VP Joe Biden.
Hey, Joe, what d'ya know, now that you're back from the Middle East Show?
As someone who has done some work himself on some thirty-five million stateless Kurds, who have been repeatedly used and abused by numerous parties for quite some time now, let me say that you, Vice President Biden, stand out as a source of relative reason and knowledge among your colleagues. You are to be commended for your concern about these people. Too often, they have been betrayed by Washington folks--big time.
My own work on this subject is listed on the recommended reference list of the Institut d'Etudes Politiques if you want to find out more: http://bibliotheque.sciences-po.fr/fr/produits/bibliographies/question-kurde/index.html
However, perhaps you can explain why tens of millions of truly stateless Kurds still have no "roadmap, " while folks like yourself expect Israel to cave in to all that Arabs demand for the creation of their own 22nd state--and 2nd, not first, one within the borders of the original mandate of Palestine as Great Britain received it on April 25, 1920. So-called "Palestinians," the entrance of most of whom into the Mandate from elsewhere is well-documented, are Arabs. Should Kurds rename themselves and demand not one, but multiple states as well, using this same game plan?
You probably already know this, which makes the hypocrisy which you either indulge in or go along with regardless, worse....
Click here for the complete article, or copy and paste this link into your web browser:
http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/article.php?id=5207
Barry Rubin
The Jerusalem Post , March 08, 2010
... It's like watching the monster sneak up behind someone. Even though you know he won't turn around, you can't help but watch in fascinated horror and yell: "Look out!" But he pays no attention.
Briefly, the Syrian government keeps punching the US in the face as Washington ignores it.
On March 1, a new record was set. The place: State Department daily press conference; the star, spokesman Philip J. Crowley. A reporter asks how the administration views the fact that the moment a US delegation left after urging Syrian President Bashar Assad to move away from Iran and stop supporting Hizbullah, Syria's dictator invited Iran's dictator along with Hizbullah's leader to visit.
In other words, the exact opposite of what the US requested. Is the government annoyed? Does it want to express some anger or issue a threat?
Let's listen. Crowley: "Well, I would point it in a slightly different direction... We want to see Syria play a more constructive role in the region. We also want - to the extent that it has the ability to talk to Iran directly - we want to make sure that Syria's communicating to Iran its concerns about its role in the region and the direction, the nature of its nuclear ambitions..."
In other words, I'm going to ignore the fact that the first thing that Assad did after Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns's visit was a love fest with Iran and Hizbullah. But even more amazing, what Crowley said is that the US government thinks Syria, Iran's partner and ally, may be upset that Iran is being aggressive and expansionist. And it actually expects the Syrians to urge Iran not to build nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, as the administration congratulates itself on explaining to Syria that it should reduce support for Hizbullah, IDF military intelligence releases an assessment that Syria is giving Hizbullah more and better arms than ever before....
Click here for the complete article, or copy and paste this link into your web browser:
http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/article.php?id=5208
John Bolton
WorldNetDaily, March 07, 2010
The only action that can stop Iran from building nuclear weapons is an Israeli strike on Tehran's nuclear facilities, argued John Bolton, the former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. under the Bush administration.
Speaking in a radio interview with WND senior reporter Aaron Klein, who hosts an investigative program on New York's WABC 770 AM, Bolton warned time is running out for an Israeli attack.
"Right now we know about the facilities. ... We know where they are," he said. "We know exactly what their dimensions are, and I think they are susceptible to an Israeli attack."
Bolton said an Israeli military option "isn't there forever. ... If Israel is going to use military force, it needs to use it sooner rather than later."
Is Israel already done for? Read Aaron Klein's "The Late Great State of Israel" to find out how much danger the holy land is really in!
Bolton posited, "Right now, basically the only scenario that I see other than Iran getting nuclear weapons is military strikes against their nuclear program that result in breaking Iran's control over the nuclear fuel cycle."
Klein's interview with Bolton can be heard HERE (part of WND article)...
Click here for the complete article, or copy and paste this link into your web browser:
http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/article.php?id=5210
We encourage you to forward our newsletters to your friends and other interested individuals and organizations.
UCI's website and emails are written to current web standards according to the W3C. If your browser or email client is not standards-compliant, you can go
here for one that is.